I'm out, I think. Thanks for organizing and playing! Rinelk, you think you are out? i don't get it. it was crystal clear at subscribing that this will be a longtime engagement. why did you join then? sorry, but thumbs down! Yeah, um, I thought it unwise to give my reason, which had some uncertainty...
Quote: "Kelsey: My ideal would be a cross-platform multiplayer standard supported by the W3C (or a similar standards body with broad acceptance) and adopted by Apple, Google, Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo...." That is a well-stated ideal, though also perhaps idealistic at this point in gaming history. ...
<t>I interpreted the Mansions of Madness comment to refer to the helper app which is integrated into the second edition, so that the players can play fully cooperatively or solo (rather than the first edition, which required a player to run the bad guys). I don't take it to indicate that they have a...
I love the idea of a site called "Strategy Pants". Sadly, "Pants Tactics" would probably mean something else.
But you could write a weekly column for Strategy Pants about behind-the-scenes stuff, work you're doing on the backend and so forth, and call it "Under"! That would make me ludicrously happy.
It's my favorite so far, gameplay-wise. I still adore the aesthetics of HM GO, but LC GO dramatically improved on the control scheme. DE GO carries that forward, and seems to be introducing a lot of new gameplay elements which produce very cool puzzles. That said, they don't even attempt to explain ...
How does this game deserve its rating? So far, a complete luckfest and in addition to the very dumb luck from dice rolls, circumstances with certain card combos can sabotage the game so significantly one wonders why one is playing. So at this point, the beginning of turn 3, I either discard my best...